🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to resume nuclear negotiations with the United States as long as it is treated with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's top diplomat has stated.

Abbas Araghchi said exclusively dialogue was effective, and revealed new appeals had come from mediators to reopen discussions with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran had zero undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran could not yet permit the global atomic watchdog to access bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Walking a Difficult Course

Araghchi is navigating a difficult route since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be operating from a stance of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had arisen stronger in military terms and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium within its borders that it will always maintain" – the key factor of the impasse in the previous talks.

Prior Negotiations Suddenly Ended

The prior phases of talks between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that ended with the US president claiming the facilities had been eliminated. Subsequently, EU nations used their authority to reinstate international penalties, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was settled an Iran-based consortium with US participation could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the partnership suggestion. Officials claimed on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to collapse due to "detractors in America".

Present Situation

Iranian officials declared the consortium offer was now withdrawn, but it seems highly likely the offer could be revived in some form if negotiations restart.

Trump in recent days claimed he had been getting signals that Iran desired to resume discussions, but privately Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet getting consistent overtures from Washington either directly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been criticized of passivity in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran asserts dialogue is not part of a show.

Negotiating Position

In his address to the forum, designed to depict the US as a controlling nation that exploits the idea of global regulations, the foreign minister declared the fortnight-long engagement showed the clash could not be ended by military means. He stated the attacks commenced with a US demand for an total Iran submission and culminated with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with full US knowledge and collaboration, making faith hard to restore.

Diplomacy Stays the Final Answer

The foreign minister declared: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted negotiations; it was the United States and the European states that had always attempted to dictate their will during the discussions. Dialogue can still be alive and stays the ultimate resolution to settle conflicts, but its requirements, rules and fundamentals must be adhered to."

"In case they talk to the Iranian people with the language of respect and respect, they will receive a response in the identical approach."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the battle of recovery and recovery, Araghchi said he was certain Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We acquired many lessons from this war; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the weaknesses of the opponent."

He stated: "We successfully passed this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to destroy, stays intact. The sites and gear, if destroyed, will be restored; what is crucial is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but failed to break. The citizens of Tehran have grown stronger, more integrated, and more endorsing of the leadership and the nation in the wake of this invasion."